By Maren R. Niehoff
Systematically studying Jewish exegesis in mild of Homeric scholarship, this ebook argues that greater than 2000 years in the past Alexandrian Jews constructed serious and literary equipment of Bible interpretation that are nonetheless tremendous appropriate this present day. Maren Niehoff offers a close research of Alexandrian Bible interpretation, from the second one century BCE via newly came across fragments to the exegetical paintings performed via Philo. Niehoff exhibits that Alexandrian Jews spoke back in a very good number of how you can the Homeric scholarship built on the Museum. a few Jewish students used the equipment in their Greek colleagues to enquire no matter if their Scripture contained myths shared by way of different countries, whereas others insisted that major alterations existed among Judaism and different cultures. This publication is key for any scholar of old Judaism, early Christianity and Hellenistic tradition.
Read Online or Download Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria PDF
Best ancient & medieval literature books
The Irish Classical Self' considers the function of classical languages and studying within the building of Irish cultural identities within the eighteenth and 19th centuries, focusing particularly at the "lower ranks" of society. This eighteenth century concept of the "classical self" grew in part out of influential id narratives built within the 17th century by way of clerics at the eu continent: responding to influential reviews of the Irish as ignorant barbarians, they released works demonstrating the worth and antiquity of indigenous tradition and made conventional annalistic claims in regards to the antiquity of Irish and connections among eire and the biblical and classical global extensively identified.
- Complete Letters (Oxford Worlds Classics)
- Tragic Pathos: Pity and Fear in Greek Philosophy and Tragedy
- Praise of folly
- The Ahhiyawa Texts
Extra resources for Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria
I, pp. –; L¨uhrs , pp. –. In Schol. Il. b and Schol. Il. a Didymus uses the term diaskeu in the context of an athetesis by Aristophanes, reflecting the usage of his own time. See also Schol. Il. –a. Early Jewish responses to Homeric scholarship manuscripts. He did not point to a version of the text where the relevant verses were lacking but instead argued that they could not have been written by Homer himself, because they did not suit the overall nature of his poetics.
Ant. ). Significantly, his Epitome of Ethics revives and transmits many orthodox Stoic views. Philo played a pivotal role in this context, too. His Exposition indicates a significant transition from his early Aristotelian environment in Alexandria to a distinctly more Roman as well as Stoic context. Finally, the conclusions of this book have important implications for the study of other fields of exegesis, especially Christian and rabbinic interpretations of the Bible. It is now time to integrate On the connection between Alexandria and Rome, see Fraser , vol.
Who takes the negation oÉc together with sesmantai, translating ‘and they have no meaning as they now exist’. This is a response, in Howard’s view, to Palestinian criticism of Alexandrian Bible recensions. Kahle , pp. –; cf. Zuntz, , pp. –, who suggests that the ‘writing’ of the Hebrew manuscripts was careless but admits that this interpretation creates numerous contradictions with subsequent paragraphs of the Letter. Cf. also Lehrs , p. , who suggests that the expression may refer to Aristonicus’ report of a work by Aristarchus entitled perª shme©wn.