Representation Theory of Finite Reductive Groups (New by Marc Cabanes, Michel Enguehard

By Marc Cabanes, Michel Enguehard

On the crossroads of illustration concept, algebraic geometry and finite workforce thought, this e-book blends jointly a few of the major matters of contemporary algebra, synthesising the previous 25 years of study, with complete proofs of a few of the main extraordinary achievements within the sector. Cabanes and Enguehard keep on with 3 major subject matters: first, purposes of étale cohomology, resulting in the evidence of the hot Bonnafé-Rouquier theorems. the second one is a simple and simplified account of the Dipper-James theorems touching on irreducible characters and modular representations. the ultimate subject matter is neighborhood illustration idea. one of many major effects here's the authors' model of Fong-Srinivasan theorems. during the textual content is illustrated by means of many examples and historical past is supplied through a number of introductory chapters on simple effects and appendices on algebraic geometry and derived different types. the result's an important advent for graduate scholars and reference for all algebraists.

Show description

Read or Download Representation Theory of Finite Reductive Groups (New Mathematical Monographs Series) PDF

Best mathematics books

Calculus II For Dummies (2nd Edition)

An easy-to-understand primer on complicated calculus topics

Calculus II is a prerequisite for plenty of renowned collage majors, together with pre-med, engineering, and physics. Calculus II For Dummies bargains professional guideline, recommendation, and the way to support moment semester calculus scholars get a deal with at the topic and ace their exams.

It covers intermediate calculus issues in undeniable English, that includes in-depth insurance of integration, together with substitution, integration ideas and whilst to exploit them, approximate integration, and unsuitable integrals. This hands-on advisor additionally covers sequences and sequence, with introductions to multivariable calculus, differential equations, and numerical research. better of all, it contains useful workouts designed to simplify and improve figuring out of this advanced subject.

creation to integration
Indefinite integrals
Intermediate Integration issues
endless sequence
complex subject matters
perform exercises

Confounded through curves? confused through polynomials? This plain-English advisor to Calculus II will set you straight!

Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline

This e-book describes the cutting-edge in a brand new department of technological know-how. the fundamental proposal was once to begin from a normal point of view on didactics of arithmetic, to spot convinced subdisciplines, and to indicate an total constitution or "topology" of the sector of analysis of didactics of arithmetic. the quantity presents a pattern of 30 unique contributions from 10 various international locations.

Extra resources for Representation Theory of Finite Reductive Groups (New Mathematical Monographs Series)

Example text

Let N I be the inverse image of W I in N , and recall that U I = U ∩ U w I . Let L I = ; this is called the Levi subgroup associated with I . Denote L = {(PI , U I )g | I ⊆ , g ∈ G}. 25. L I has a strongly split BN-pair of characteristic p given by (Bw I , N I , I ). One has a semi-direct product decomposition PI = U I > L I , and U I is the largest normal p-subgroup of PI . So L above is a set of subquotients. Proof. Let us check first that L I has a split BN-pair. The axioms (TS1) and (TS3) are clear.

19(v) told us that Bδ ∪ Bδ sδ Bδ is a group, so sδ Bδ sδ ⊆ Bδ ∪ Bδ sδ Bδ . Thus we have our claim. We must show that the BN-pair of L I is strongly split. We have seen that Bw I = X I T , a semi-direct product where X I = U ∩ Bw I = U ∩ U x0 w I . So, given J ⊆ I , we must check X I ∩ (X I )w J X I . We have X I = U ∩ w0 w I wJ w0 w I wJ w0 w I w J U and X I ∩ (X I ) = U ∩ U ∩U ∩U . Knowing that U ∩ U wJ U by the strongly split condition satisfied in G, it suffices to check that U ∩ U w0 w I ∩ U w J ∩ U w0 w I w J = U ∩ U w0 w I ∩ U w J .

We state (and prove) the following results for future reference. 29. Let I ⊆ . Then the following hold. (i) NG (U I ) = PI and U I is the largest normal p-subgroup of PI . (ii) If g ∈ G is such that g U I ⊆ U , then g ∈ PI and g U I = U I . If moreover g U I = U J for some J ⊆ , then I = J . Proof. (i) NG (U I ) contains PI , so NG (U I ) is a parabolic subgroup PJ with J ⊇ I . Assume δ ∈ \ I is such that (U I )sδ = U I . Since X δ ⊆ U I , we have X −δ = (X δ )sδ ⊆ U I ⊆ U , a contradiction. So J = I .

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.15 of 5 – based on 22 votes